We
apparently still have the rule of law in our nation, and the
Constitution stands. Okay, that was a fairly bold statement. In a
country where governmental regulatory mandates increasingly compel
faith-based social service, health care, and educational providers to
offer services contrary to their religious convictions and moral
conscience or else shutter their doors, the US Supreme Court recently
affirmed that religious liberty remains intact in at least one narrow
area of the law: the ministerial exception in federal employment
discrimination legislation.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote
for the court. “The interest of society in the enforcement of employment
discrimination statutes is undoubtedly important, but so too is the
interest of religious groups in choosing who will preach their beliefs,
teach their faith, and carry out their mission.” When those principles
are in conflict, Roberts said, “the First Amendment has struck the
balance for us.”
It has been said by keener minds than mine
that the governmental attitude toward religious liberty in the United
States is tending toward the notion that religious liberty means that
anyone can attend a church of their own choosing if they wish, but must
keep the practice of faith and its moral application inside the walls of
that church. Contrast that with the Great Commission of Jesus to go
into all the world, preach and teach, and baptize.
Neither the
message of the Gospel nor its moral application in public life
remained confined to the four walls of the Upper Room. Similiarly,
religious conviction and its moral application were not kept distant
from the development of public policy over the centuries -- in any part
of the globe, and no matter the religious belief.
The First
Amendment to the US Constitution does not provide for or mandate
separation of Church and State. It protects the State from an
establishment of religion, and it protects religion from restriction of
the free exercise thereof by the State. It protects liberty for both
Church and State.
1/12/12
Msgr. William J. King
No comments:
Post a Comment